Psycho Review

Psycho

Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho has long been heralded as one of the best pieces of cinema history, and after finally watching it for myself, I can plainly see why. Due to some astounding acting, haunting soundtrack, and a keen sense of scene direction, Hitchcock created one of the finest, and scariest, ‘horror’ movies ever, and it’s barely aged a day.

The Bates Motel is a small place off the side of the highway, mostly forgotten. Its owners, Norman Bates and his mother, live in a large house just up the hill from their quaint motel with only each other for company. But what happens when two, mentally unstable people are confined together for years and years? Apparently nothing good.

By keeping most of this twisted mother and son relationship under wraps, Hitchcock allows the viewer to fill in the holes with their own idea as to what has become of Norman, and while it does leave many questions unanswered, it’s all a part of the film’s ingenuity.

Psycho- the House

Looks like a normal house on a hill right? Wrong.

In a time where most directors feel the need to cram every ounce of information down people’s throat, it’s refreshing to watch a movie so unique that it really doesn’t care what you think of it, instead opting to merely supply the framework for the viewer’s opinion and letting them fill in the details.

From the minute he walks on-screen, you just know there’s something not quite right about Norman Bates. He’s quirky, and even caring to an extent, but there’s something about him that just sends a creepy chill down your spine. Anthony Perkins gives a truly astounding performance here, and let me tell you, I’m not sure I’ve seen a finer actor in any classic movie.

He’s equal parts charming and unsettling, and seeing the way he stumbles over his words, or tries to cover up a dark lie, is incredibly realistic and even scary. Norman is a man at war with himself (literally), and Perkins does such a stand-up job portraying how truly disturbed this young man is that you can’t help but be enthralled, and terrified, by this character.

You don’t know the meaning of a ‘slasher flick’ until you’ve seen Psycho.

In fact, every character here gives a great performance. From the minor to the major, every actor in this film gives it their all and there really isn’t a single weak link among the cast. Jane Leigh gives a relatable and sympathetic tone to a woman who steals forty-thousand dollars from her boss, and while she is only present for the first half of the film, she leaves such a mark on the story that she never truly leaves your mind.

Even her sister Lila and boyfriend Sam, played by Vera Miles and John Gavin respectively, give a great portrayal of two people looking for answers. While not as developed as they could be, these two do a really good job of giving the viewer someone to root for; and in a story filled with dark, disturbing people, it’s a welcome addition.

But really, this is Norman Bates’ show all the way, and even when the story slows down, it’s his chilling character that keeps you interested. There’s a reason Psycho has been renowned for so many years, and I’d be lying if I said it wasn’t primarily because of this single character.

Psycho-PI

Nosy private investigator? Check.

And if Norman isn’t the reason for Psycho’s fame, then the only valid substitution would be the plot twists. While the basic storyline is simple, it consistently keeps you guessing, and thanks to a shocking turn of events just before the halfway point, you will be unable to shake the chilling feelings that something very bad is just around the next corner.

For a movie that’s over fifty-years old, there’s not much about Psycho that really shows its age. While the violence is brutal, it’s done mostly off-screen, and outside of a few cheesy shots, Hitchcock did an amazing job filming this movie to last the test of time. Even the soundtrack is fantastic, giving every scene the desired amount of creepy and keeping that uneasy feeling alive long after the violence has passed.

The only real complaint I have in regards to the way way Psycho was filmed is that a lot of the movie takes place in the dark. I’m not talking about the black-and-white visuals (which are great), but rather that a majority of the more important scenes takes place in dark, making it occasionally difficult to see what’s happening. Maybe this was a purposeful choice on Hitchcock’s part, but either way, it did irritate me a bit.

Psycho-Norman Bates

The epitome of creepy.

It’s true that I would’ve appreciated more of a true ‘climax’, but what it lacks in flashiness, it makes up for in shock value. Even after numerous twists and turns, the film’s final, resounding twist will shock you and ingrain itself in your mind for a long, long time. And that uneasy feeling that occupied your gut for the entire film, it’s definitely not going anywhere anytime soon.

Hitchcock truly has crafted a masterpiece of cinema with Psycho. It’s a timeless, forever haunting experience that every movie buff should watch. While it’s not perfect, it is brilliant, and I can’t believe it has taken me this long to finally see it. If you have any doubts about Psycho, cast them aside, pop a big bowl of popcorn, and just let the story unfold itself for you. It really is worth it.

9.0

Advertisements

11 responses to “Psycho Review

  1. I’m glad you liked this! I remember that you wanted to start off watching one of the best in the genre after I had posted my Horror 101 post. I enjoyed and was impressed with your perspective of the movie and I agree that while the film is dark in many places it’s a move on Hitch’s part that after having watched a few more times you will get used to. Good job, William! Keep ’em coming! Maybe in the future we can work on a piece together since you are starting off on your path through horror flicks! Let me know. – Vic

    • I really wanted to enjoy this, so I was glad that I did. 😀 I am actually starting down a horror movie path, I doubt it’ll ever be my cup of tea, but I do have The Thing next up on my Classic Movie Bucket List, so we’ll see how things play out. I’d love to work together sometime though. 😀

      • John Carpenter’s The Thing? Cool! Enjoy. I hold that movie in such high regard. It’s JC’s Citizen Kane. Looking forward to your review of it. I’ll keep in touch so we can work on something in the near future. – Vic

  2. We know so much about special effects now and we expect to see lots of fancy stuff onscreen these days, but if you could just try and imagine what it must have been like seeing Psycho when first came out, you would have been terrified. It was something totally new. Audiences were shocked and they probably went home and checked behind their shower curtains for a few weeks afterward. One movie that had that kind of effect on me was Jaws.

    • Oh I bet! I do think that because of all the new special effects and stuff, this movie didn’t really scare me, but it did creep me out. I can certainly imagine it as terrifying though back when it first came out.

  3. Great Review. No director today could come close to the mastery of Hitchcock. His work depended more on psychological fear than on the physical. I love his older works (1930’s & 40’s) a lot more.

    • Couldn’t agree more. It’s almost sad that today’s ‘horror’ stems almost entirely from flashy gore and surprises, rather than the psychological terror that Hitchcock seems to understand so well. That’s not to say the modern horror isn’t fun, because it can be, but rather that the classic horror movies were just better. I’ll be interested to see how his older works hold up though, it’s odd going from watching brilliantly flashy movies like The Avengers to black-and-what dramas such as Psycho here. 🙂

  4. It’s cool that you were able to finally see Psycho. What’s interesting about Perkins is that I’ve seen him in some other films and have not been that impressed. I think that was just the right part for him to shine, and Hitchcock cast him perfectly.

    • I wondered if he was as great in his other parts, but don’t know if I really want to pursue finding out. I’m kind of happy with knowing him as the genius behind Norman Bates to be honest. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s